In the common law of torts, res ipsa loquitur latin for the thing speaks for itself is a doctrine that infers negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved. In south african law which is modelled on roman dutch law, there is no doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, although the phrase is used regularly to mean the facts speak for themselves. The latinism res ipsa loquitur appears to have been intro duced into the. Shains scholarship is idiosyncratic, and while prosser describes this third interpretation of res ipsa, he also catalogues its minimal and contested use in the united. Doctrine of res ispa loquitur may shift burden of proof on. Res ipsa loquiturburden of proofno contributory negligence. The origins of res ipsa loquitur this concept originated from a case where a plaintiff was walking by a warehouse and a barrel of flour fell onto them, causing an injury. Res ipsa loquitur is not a cause of action but a rule of evidence. Trespassburden of proofres ipsa loquitur the cambridge.
For res ipsa loquitur to be applicable, the claimant must produce evidence from which a lay jury could conclude, by a preponderance of evidence, that the incident resulted from negligence and was the responsibility of the defendant 24. The defendant had exclusive control over the instrumentality or situation that caused the injury. It is so obvious d was negligent, waste of time having c prove this. Reliable information about the coronavirus covid19 is available from the world health organization current situation, international travel. Prima facie, which means at first glance, refers to the fact that enough evidence exists, if taken at face value, to file charges or pursue a legal action. Oct 12, 2015 res ipsa loquitur refers to a situation in which the facts of a case make it selfevident that the defendants negligence caused the plaintiffs injury or damages. Doctrine of res ispa loquitur may shift burden of proof on to.
To prove res ipsa loquitor negligence, the plaintiff must prove 3 things. A medical malpractice lawsuit is a complicated undertaking. Res ipsa loquitur is latin for the thing speaks for itself. Informed consent and res ipsa loquitur in rhode island medical malpractice cases. Applying res ipsa loquitur to premises liability fire cases. Albert levitt assures us in an introduction is learned, keenly analytical and com. Res ipsa loquitur burden of proof no contributory negligence. In terms of medical malpractice, the res ipsa doctrine refers to cases where the doctors treatment was so far below the appropriate standard of care that negligence is assumed.
In modern, colloquial and conversational english, a common. Burden of proof is an article from the yale law journal, volume 29. In order for a plaintiff to meet his or her burden of proof by circumstantial evidence. The effect of res ipsa legal definition of the effect of res ipsa. The limited use of inferred negligence in medical cases. The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause limitations on res ipsa loquitur. Evidence onus of proof road traffic accident no explanation j6r accident doctrine of res ipsa loquitur circumstances where doctrine operates so as to shift burden of proof on to defendant to. The term is used to refer or describe anything that is plain, clear or selfexplanatory and needs no further explanation, proof or clarification. Res ipsa loquitur does not shift any burden of proof or onus from one party to the other. Res ipsa loquitur, presumptions and burden of proof. On the other hand, if the doctrine is too narrowly construed or eliminated entirely, innocent patients who are harmed by negligent acts may be barred from receiving any compensation for. Res ipsa loquitur in clinical negligence cases hardwicke.
This doctrine raises a presumption of negligence and switches the burden to the defendant to prove she was not negligent. I agree that, if the rule of res ipsa loquitur determines this case, the scope of that rule is found in sweeney v. Accident during course of employment workman injured by. When a doctors negligence speaks for itself alllaw. The ril shifting mechanism is inspired by the burden shifting function of the traditional res ipsa loquitur doctrine. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has been applied to many fire cases. This chapter examines the res ipsa loquitur presumption in relation to tort liability under uncertainty. The essence is that an event which in the ordinary cause of thingswas more likely than not to be caused by negligence was by itself evidence of negligence due to the absence of explanation. Res ipsa loquitur latin, the thing speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur is the rule of evidence affecting burden of proof. Numerous and frequentlyupdated resource results are available from this search. The difference between the two is that prima facie is a term meaning there is enough evidence for there to be a case to answer. This is a illinois jury instructions form that can be used for 022 burden of proof res ipsa loquitur within civil.
Burden of proof shifted to d as easier for him to prove he was not negligent. Res ipsa loquitur latin for the thing speaks for itself if defendant is in control of a situation where a plaintiff was injured, and has superior knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the injury, the plaintiff might have difficulty proving negligence. In its analysis, the court first noted that medical malpractice actions are governed by tenn. It is the idea that there are some situations that are so obviously dangerous that the mere existence of the situation shifts the burden of proof onto the defendant to prove that he or she was not negligent. Res ipsa loquitur definition, examples, cases, processes. Oct 06, 2015 res ipsa loquitur means the thing speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur wex us law lii legal information. Rather, it becomes the function of the trier of fact to weigh the strength of the inference of general negligence. Res ipsa loquitur is a rule that the fact of the occurrence of an injury and the surrounding circumstances of the defendants control and management permits an inference of culpability on the part of the defendant, make out plaintiffs prima facie case, and present a question of fact for the defendant to meet with an explanationiii. Res ipsa loquitur burden of proof lsu law digital commons.
Latin for the thing speaks for itself, a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if hesheit had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and without negligence the accident would not have happened. Res ipsa loquitur means that the facts of the occurrence warrant an inference of negligence, not that they compel such an inference, nor does res ipsa loquitur convert the defendants general issue into an affirmative defense. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, in its ordinary sense, relieves a plaintiff of the burden of proving the precise cause of injury but not of the. Jul 28, 2017 however, sometimes fairness demands that the burden be switched on to the defendant to prove that they were not in fact negligent. When a doctors negligence speaks for itself establishing a health care providers wrongdoing is never easy, but a legal concept known as res ipsa loquitur a latin phrase which means the thing speaks for itself may make it easier for some medical malpractice plaintiffs. Trespassburden of proofres ipsa loquitur volume 17 issue 1 glanville williams. Sep 01, 2015 if facts within the special knowledge of the accused are not satisfactorily explained by the accused it would be a factor against him, though by itself it would not be conclusive about his guilt. Res ipsa loquiter legal definition of res ipsa loquiter. Chandrasekharan pillai, burden of proof in criminal cases and the.
In personal injury law, the concept of res ipsa loquitur or just res ipsa for short operates as an evidentiary rule that allows plaintiffs to establish a rebuttable presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant through the use of circumstantial evidence this means that while plaintiffs typically have to. If the injury or damage wouldnt ordinarily have occurred if reasonable care had been exercised, and if the defendant had exclusive control over the cause of the injury, however, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant. The announced thesis of the book is to demonstrate that the doc trine of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of substantive law which throws the burden of proof on the. Res ipsa loquiturburden of proofwhile an employee of the defendant was engaged in filling the gas tank of a bus in the defendants station, a fire. June 10, 1971 negligence burden of proof res ipsa loquitur whether necessary to plead.
Res ipsa loquitur flashcards in a level and ib law. Res ipsa loquitur wikimili, the best wikipedia reader. This shift is called res ipsa loquitur, which is latin for the thing speaks for itself. Applying res ipsa loquitur to medical negligence cases requires the plaintiff to. A rebuttable presumption or inference that the defendant was negligent, which arises upon proof that the instrumentality or condition causing the injury was in the defendants exclusive control and that the accident was one that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence. Res ipsa loquitur is a latin phrase that means the thing speaks for itself. Damagesa plaintiff must prove that he has been injured, or that he has had some kind of. Burden of proof is an article from the yale law journal, volume 29 view more articles from the yale law journal. Here are four hundred and eightysix pages of heavy discourse on the familiar doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, which mr. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendants control. Res ipsa loquitur the three elements of res ipsa loquitur are that the event must not generally occur unless someone is negligent, must be caused by an instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant, and must not have been due to any voluntary action. Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine which applies when the negligence is so apparent, a presumption of the breach of duty leading to the action or occurrence can be made by the court.
Res ipsa loquitur and in the federal courts,29 but the contrary is the rule in washing ton,30 connecticut,31 virginia,32 massachusetts, and probably in new york. Literally, res ipsa loquitur is latin for the thing speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur the three elements of res ipsa loquitur are that the event must not generally occur unless someone is negligent, must be caused by an instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant, and must not have been due to any voluntary action or contribution of the plaintiff. Literally, the phrase res ipsa loquitur means the thing speaks for itself.
Res ipsa loquitur test open textbooks for hong kong. Although the massachusetts supreme court found this burden satisfied. Judicial noticecertain facts are so notorious as to not require evidence to prove them eg dublin is the capital of ireland, the sun sets in the west. Res ipsa loquitur the thing speaks for itself a reversal of the burden of proof.
Res ipsa loquitur, presumptions and burden of proof mark. In his book, the case against the supreme court 5, erwin. This is a illinois jury instructions form that can be used for 022 burden of proofres ipsa loquitur within civil. The issue was whether the plaintiff satisfied his burden of proof under res ipsa loquitur. Res ipsa loquitur prima facie is often confused with res ipsa loquitur the thing speaks for itself, or literally the thing itself speaks, the common law doctrine that when the facts make it selfevident that negligence or other responsibility lies with a party, it is not necessary to provide extraneous details, since any reasonable person. The first variant merely allows the factfinder to infer the defendants negligence from the presumptions basic facts, the second requires the factfinder to draw such an inference if the defendant fails to produce exonerating evidence, and. Nevertheless, for a fervent defense of the burden of proof interpretation of res ipsa s scope, see mark shain, res ipsa loquitur. The phrase is merely a handy phrase used by lawyers. The literal translation would be at first face or at first appearance, from the feminine forms of primus first and facies face, both in the ablative case. Effect of doctrine of res ipsa loquitur yale law school. In a pi setting it has been applied in a wide range of cases including objects falling from buildings, malfunctioning machines, collapsing cranes, and stones in buns. But, in cases involving res ipsa loquitur, this burden of proof shifts to the person that injured you. As a general proposition the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may be said to ap.
The rule of evidence known as res ipsa loquitur comes to the aid of. Res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice legalmatch. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence. However, it is possible for the person to offer enough evidence to overcome res ipsa loquitur. To have a good complaint, the plaintiff must plead negligence. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant. From res ipsa loquitur to diethylstilbestrol diethylstilbestrol des. In the common law of torts, res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine that infers negligence from the very. Such is the case for the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. Res ipsa loquitur is often confused with prima facie at first sight, the common law doctrine that a party must show some minimum amount of evidence before a trial is worthwhile. Res ipsa loquitur and inferences from circumstantial evidence.
This means that if the defendant fails to meet this burden, he or she will be held liable. Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the burden of proof falls to the. Oclcs webjunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. Res ipsa loquitur project gutenberg selfpublishing. The injury would not have occurred but for someones negligence. Mar 05, 2017 res ipsa loquitur the facts speaks for themselves. Where the rule of res ipsa loquitur applies, it does not have the effect of shifting the burden of proof. Although modern formulations differ by jurisdiction, common law originally stated that the accident must satisfy the necessary elements of negligence.
1085 492 237 1164 1230 161 1427 827 1335 240 352 207 150 1362 743 65 846 984 1 1119 1438 397 936 1330 329 624 721 1295 1292 565 391 363 661 839 711 530 663 1359 79